Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-20 17:49:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 393B30EF41AB62232CD52CFD92668B406BC6F7D055E77DD9E80BC0B85980D6C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Originalism "All statements in the constitution must be interpreted based on the original understanding of the authors or the people at the time it was ratified." It is an objective interpretation of the Constitution. His claims of corruption are not supported by any evidence https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/white-papers/on-originalism-in-constitutional-interpretation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594072395555475459
  • participantId - 393B30EF41AB62232CD52CFD92668B406BC6F7D055E77DD9E80BC0B85980D6C2
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1668966582684
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1594072395555475459393B30EF41AB62232CD52CFD92668B406BC6F7D055E77DD9E80BC0B85980D6C2