Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-20 19:01:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E2A6A3794DA833A3788B592CAE4EA52B2214FEEC5D3CE4DFC5E1DB6B8037AA1A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Interesting Twitter poll, context absent, have the terms of service changed since the violation? If not, why would you even consider it? No lawsuits against the suspension have succeeded, seems it shouldn't be decided by the users, let the TOS prevail.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594064583840464898
  • participantId - E2A6A3794DA833A3788B592CAE4EA52B2214FEEC5D3CE4DFC5E1DB6B8037AA1A
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1668970902498
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1594064583840464898E2A6A3794DA833A3788B592CAE4EA52B2214FEEC5D3CE4DFC5E1DB6B8037AA1A