Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-19 23:26:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9AAA60354CEA98EE3C5D9C5BBD78D28D5581ABFAA0F8F11A48EA4553BA95872
Participant Details

Original Note:

Interesting Twitter poll, context absent, have the terms of service changed since the violation? If not, why would you even consider it? No lawsuits against the suspension have succeeded, seems it shouldn't be decided by the users, let the TOS prevail.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594064583840464898
  • participantId - B9AAA60354CEA98EE3C5D9C5BBD78D28D5581ABFAA0F8F11A48EA4553BA95872
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1668900363065
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1594064583840464898B9AAA60354CEA98EE3C5D9C5BBD78D28D5581ABFAA0F8F11A48EA4553BA95872