Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-20 00:16:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 62D6CC9CABE9C4D5CDF3EA64523FEF5B2A4A4D1C6EDE39F3650A8D02CBC8FA92
Participant Details

Original Note:

Interesting Twitter poll, context absent, have the terms of service changed since the violation? If not, why would you even consider it? No lawsuits against the suspension have succeeded, seems it shouldn't be decided by the users, let the TOS prevail.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594064583840464898
  • participantId - 62D6CC9CABE9C4D5CDF3EA64523FEF5B2A4A4D1C6EDE39F3650A8D02CBC8FA92
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1668903369670
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 159406458384046489862D6CC9CABE9C4D5CDF3EA64523FEF5B2A4A4D1C6EDE39F3650A8D02CBC8FA92