Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-19 19:54:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADD6D84E1F57E6163E655F2B417E4696E606ADB54DD1EDE679CED0D4F3222ABD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter does not meet any standard or definition of open-source news or open source journalism as the platform is not open-source for news development (that team no longer exists and their GitHub is unmonitored) nor does "Twitter" land on singular while evolving content. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_journalism https://opensource.twitter.dev/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1593636643625369601
  • participantId - ADD6D84E1F57E6163E655F2B417E4696E606ADB54DD1EDE679CED0D4F3222ABD
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1668887697490
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1593636643625369601ADD6D84E1F57E6163E655F2B417E4696E606ADB54DD1EDE679CED0D4F3222ABD