Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-14 16:26:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DB5485CAF18DAEF5D67863569EEAB897728AE7883D590F0A1D3AC3464AB50AB3
Participant Details

Original Note:

While Twitter's SEC-required financial statements do not include a separate category for food, it is inherently implausible that Twitter spent $400 per meal served. The former head of food service's estimate of $20-25 dollar per meal is inherently more plausible. https://twitter.com/_hawko/status/1591909771124539393

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1591950954617835520
  • participantId - DB5485CAF18DAEF5D67863569EEAB897728AE7883D590F0A1D3AC3464AB50AB3
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1668443163886
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1591950954617835520DB5485CAF18DAEF5D67863569EEAB897728AE7883D590F0A1D3AC3464AB50AB3