Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-14 00:47:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 72E23C45FE8916E77D481EE11A501C9783E1008F0BC02490E0BE6CED792B3221
Participant Details

Original Note:

While Twitter's SEC-required financial statements do not include a separate category for food, it is inherently implausible that Twitter spent $400 per meal served. The former head of food service's estimate of $20-25 dollar per meal is inherently more plausible. https://twitter.com/_hawko/status/1591909771124539393

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1591950954617835520
  • participantId - 72E23C45FE8916E77D481EE11A501C9783E1008F0BC02490E0BE6CED792B3221
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1668386859897
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 159195095461783552072E23C45FE8916E77D481EE11A501C9783E1008F0BC02490E0BE6CED792B3221