Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-07 15:23:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C73C7F685A58EE17B470DD7ADE00FC9F87B7B238E952A43D71C9D3571D05DD7E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA) would not be able to codify Roe V Wade protections from a congressional standpoint. The law itself was overturned by the Supreme Court and would take that body to overturn any ruling. https://www.heritage.org/life/commentary/womens-health-protection-act-unconstitutional-and-more-radical-roe-v-wade

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1589636224943149056
  • participantId - C73C7F685A58EE17B470DD7ADE00FC9F87B7B238E952A43D71C9D3571D05DD7E
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1667834613165
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1589636224943149056C73C7F685A58EE17B470DD7ADE00FC9F87B7B238E952A43D71C9D3571D05DD7E