Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-07 02:46:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 52E9D35ED225CD1C2AB3DAF4AD34BEE0106B9A27CAEC80F34FED95B6CBDBEA1A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The supreme court has held that works of parody need not be explicitly labeled. The Onion's recent amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court argues this as well. Since usernames are easily seen on Twitter, it's likely that a "reasonable person" would discern the parody.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1589409355274850304
  • participantId - 52E9D35ED225CD1C2AB3DAF4AD34BEE0106B9A27CAEC80F34FED95B6CBDBEA1A
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1667789213325
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 158940935527485030452E9D35ED225CD1C2AB3DAF4AD34BEE0106B9A27CAEC80F34FED95B6CBDBEA1A