Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-07 00:41:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3922021E2B4C1A4B610B8FAFE0447925B4441B7A397CBAE1E446B9DE65C2A8E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The supreme court has held that works of parody need not be explicitly labeled. The Onion's recent amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court argues this as well. Since usernames are easily seen on Twitter, it's likely that a "reasonable person" would discern the parody.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1589409355274850304
  • participantId - 3922021E2B4C1A4B610B8FAFE0447925B4441B7A397CBAE1E446B9DE65C2A8E3
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1667781684007
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15894093552748503043922021E2B4C1A4B610B8FAFE0447925B4441B7A397CBAE1E446B9DE65C2A8E3