Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-07 04:41:11 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1AF442817EB0EBF68B5988B423A9ACABF2ABF9FFD6E5AE18C4BDA31686A1B33F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The supreme court has held that works of parody need not be explicitly labeled. The Onion's recent amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court argues this as well. Since usernames are easily seen on Twitter, it's likely that a "reasonable person" would discern the parody.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1589409355274850304
  • participantId - 1AF442817EB0EBF68B5988B423A9ACABF2ABF9FFD6E5AE18C4BDA31686A1B33F
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1667796071264
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15894093552748503041AF442817EB0EBF68B5988B423A9ACABF2ABF9FFD6E5AE18C4BDA31686A1B33F