Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-05 23:07:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75A087788BDE216B1EEC8B6204A4C85AB53F38DE4E90B26F4171676894AD32E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Birdwatch / Community notes allows people to leave notes on Tweets. For a tweet to be seen by the public it needs to get wide support from different groups on Twitter. This means political disinformation generally goes unchallenged. https://techpolicy.press/researchers-explore-partisanship-in-twitter-crowdsourced-fact-checking-program-birdwatch/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1588965624209756160
  • participantId - 75A087788BDE216B1EEC8B6204A4C85AB53F38DE4E90B26F4171676894AD32E6
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1667689642837
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 158896562420975616075A087788BDE216B1EEC8B6204A4C85AB53F38DE4E90B26F4171676894AD32E6