Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-04 17:27:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 33F443248EDFB4DC224BD3E120BAE5A4FA4312FAF2E8C20A1291163809CA1D76
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the claim appears serious, unfortunately there isn't any context link included in the tweet to substantiate it as a fact. The closest I could find was the following Wired article, yet it doesn't surface the races of those involved with the fired team. https://www.wired.com/story/twitter-ethical-ai-team/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1588574207880962049
  • participantId - 33F443248EDFB4DC224BD3E120BAE5A4FA4312FAF2E8C20A1291163809CA1D76
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1667582863330
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 158857420788096204933F443248EDFB4DC224BD3E120BAE5A4FA4312FAF2E8C20A1291163809CA1D76