Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-02 23:29:37 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 136ED5E9C331B628122AF8B5938CED346CEC1BE52A8C9E65449E4AEC700EE651
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's just not accurate to say that Birdwatch notes are regularly applied to members of both parties. It happens regularly to Democrats and comperatively rarely to Republicans. Pundits on both sides get fact checked regularly. For people in elected office, there's a notable skew.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1587940758799138817
  • participantId - 136ED5E9C331B628122AF8B5938CED346CEC1BE52A8C9E65449E4AEC700EE651
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1667431777332
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1587940758799138817136ED5E9C331B628122AF8B5938CED346CEC1BE52A8C9E65449E4AEC700EE651