Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-30 16:59:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C73F960DDEC273680B9033E05C5E05D58E4A3D2DB85B70301CD842606D5A3AC4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author of this piece (from an alt-weekly) cites con authoritative sources, and stokes conspiracy tones with “I might disappear for reporting this.” His second graf starts with “IMHO.” And his news peg is simply “some on social media are skeptical.” Link is pure opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1586763518556135430
  • participantId - C73F960DDEC273680B9033E05C5E05D58E4A3D2DB85B70301CD842606D5A3AC4
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1667149163570
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1586763518556135430C73F960DDEC273680B9033E05C5E05D58E4A3D2DB85B70301CD842606D5A3AC4