Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-30 17:34:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5EF14A94C8C102EF5691219BD9EA4380D9E580AEC470211C9265112C33B8566D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author of this piece (from an alt-weekly) cites con authoritative sources, and stokes conspiracy tones with “I might disappear for reporting this.” His second graf starts with “IMHO.” And his news peg is simply “some on social media are skeptical.” Link is pure opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1586763518556135430
  • participantId - 5EF14A94C8C102EF5691219BD9EA4380D9E580AEC470211C9265112C33B8566D
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1667151268818
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15867635185561354305EF14A94C8C102EF5691219BD9EA4380D9E580AEC470211C9265112C33B8566D