Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-30 23:51:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A2C464FAC2188C1D67B922ABF6379E5F329557589A93CE189492E3B3553FF7D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Katz has written a thorough refutation of Singal's claim that the screenshoted editorial is dishonest. Most notably he points out that Cotton himself uses 'protest' and 'riot' interchangeably, despite claiming at points that he only means 'illegal' protests. https://twitter.com/KatzOnEarth/status/1586481017497407488

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1586736022800502786
  • participantId - A2C464FAC2188C1D67B922ABF6379E5F329557589A93CE189492E3B3553FF7D9
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1667173904700
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1586736022800502786A2C464FAC2188C1D67B922ABF6379E5F329557589A93CE189492E3B3553FF7D9