Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-31 13:58:12 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E029615EC0F56F0AC8292EB665B1FF9ECD69BEA1F1587C53E5F90C72C918DF8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Katz has written a thorough refutation of Singal's claim that the screenshoted editorial is dishonest. Most notably he points out that Cotton himself uses 'protest' and 'riot' interchangeably, despite claiming at points that he only means 'illegal' protests. https://twitter.com/KatzOnEarth/status/1586481017497407488

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1586736022800502786
  • participantId - 5E029615EC0F56F0AC8292EB665B1FF9ECD69BEA1F1587C53E5F90C72C918DF8
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1667224692079
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15867360228005027865E029615EC0F56F0AC8292EB665B1FF9ECD69BEA1F1587C53E5F90C72C918DF8