Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-31 02:31:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C8EF1F4686B66C37E6E7BC8B48FFB62717ED8EC901B925D1373B5344E939FF0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Katz has written a thorough refutation of Singal's claim that the screenshoted editorial is dishonest. Most notably he points out that Cotton himself uses 'protest' and 'riot' interchangeably, despite claiming at points that he only means 'illegal' protests. https://twitter.com/KatzOnEarth/status/1586481017497407488

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1586736022800502786
  • participantId - 0C8EF1F4686B66C37E6E7BC8B48FFB62717ED8EC901B925D1373B5344E939FF0
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1667183492999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15867360228005027860C8EF1F4686B66C37E6E7BC8B48FFB62717ED8EC901B925D1373B5344E939FF0