Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-13 02:43:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8A2B2083E957A159F6871F31805FB1F08AB02EA9E1DAC45E369DF5C8D8C30AE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

As archeologists have stated in replies, assigning sex to skeletal remains is not as simple as this post claims. Due to ambiguity, archeologists use 5 categories for likelihood of biological sex (not 2), and interpret likely gender from cultural artifacts found with remains. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43967044

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1580207318733443072
  • participantId - 8A2B2083E957A159F6871F31805FB1F08AB02EA9E1DAC45E369DF5C8D8C30AE5
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1665629005946
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15802073187334430728A2B2083E957A159F6871F31805FB1F08AB02EA9E1DAC45E369DF5C8D8C30AE5