Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-04 18:02:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9DB61B6404AAF0A3724FC0FFCAB92BD2DE01C1E4F0FAA6D32FD374B1FDD74CEE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Needs a better note. It's unclear if the high rated one means to support or debunk the tweet. If it's misleading, the note should specify what's wrong with the tweet. As is, it seems to back it up. I THINK the point is that this isn't a direct quote but note doesn't say so.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1576946917233270785
  • participantId - 9DB61B6404AAF0A3724FC0FFCAB92BD2DE01C1E4F0FAA6D32FD374B1FDD74CEE
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1664906523097
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15769469172332707859DB61B6404AAF0A3724FC0FFCAB92BD2DE01C1E4F0FAA6D32FD374B1FDD74CEE