Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-02 23:34:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FAD99615A77E51C62FCD8AC0467C5472FAB75B29F9899262437ECE8190AAB918
Participant Details

Original Note:

Justifications for the vote against relief funding belong in replies and QRTs, not Birdwatch notes. Sources citing Republican’s claims about a hypothetical bill they would vote against don’t disprove this Tweet’s claim about a specific vote that has already happened,

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1576617941579210752
  • participantId - FAD99615A77E51C62FCD8AC0467C5472FAB75B29F9899262437ECE8190AAB918
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1664753695953
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1576617941579210752FAD99615A77E51C62FCD8AC0467C5472FAB75B29F9899262437ECE8190AAB918