Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-02 18:00:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 312B14E49D1BC2D524A9149B167ADE5DF3C100157BB02176DC939C41849F215D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Justifications for the vote against relief funding belong in replies and QRTs, not Birdwatch notes. Sources citing Republican’s claims about a hypothetical bill they would vote against don’t disprove this Tweet’s claim about a specific vote that has already happened,

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1576617941579210752
  • participantId - 312B14E49D1BC2D524A9149B167ADE5DF3C100157BB02176DC939C41849F215D
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1664733617578
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1576617941579210752312B14E49D1BC2D524A9149B167ADE5DF3C100157BB02176DC939C41849F215D