Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-08-22 18:44:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9736DF42171A999208E640D9616E3AF1D2219C9694E38F806D374F891F58485E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Many of the essays were written by historians and all were thouroughly referenced using historical scholarship. Some historians have critiqued some points made, but those too are supported by scholarly research. Those critiques have been overblown as a wholesale 'debunking.' https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/12/historians-clash-1619-project/604093/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1561473362509144066
participantId - 9736DF42171A999208E640D9616E3AF1D2219C9694E38F806D374F891F58485E
raterParticipantId -
createdAtMillis - 1661193885588
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 15614733625091440669736DF42171A999208E640D9616E3AF1D2219C9694E38F806D374F891F58485E