Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-08-22 08:18:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7087E95487E4F49E9FE3EF2308E4E4C539279C891CE4980F97832BC1B9A1F35D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Many of the essays were written by historians and all were thouroughly referenced using historical scholarship. Some historians have critiqued some points made, but those too are supported by scholarly research. Those critiques have been overblown as a wholesale 'debunking.' https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/12/historians-clash-1619-project/604093/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1561473362509144066
participantId - 7087E95487E4F49E9FE3EF2308E4E4C539279C891CE4980F97832BC1B9A1F35D
raterParticipantId -
createdAtMillis - 1661156311716
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 15614733625091440667087E95487E4F49E9FE3EF2308E4E4C539279C891CE4980F97832BC1B9A1F35D