Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-08-22 09:47:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E1A8CAD22E718690EFE2734CC091826B6E1090F399CF78A56A792000A5055E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Many of the essays were written by historians and all were thouroughly referenced using historical scholarship. Some historians have critiqued some points made, but those too are supported by scholarly research. Those critiques have been overblown as a wholesale 'debunking.' https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/12/historians-clash-1619-project/604093/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1561473362509144066
participantId - 2E1A8CAD22E718690EFE2734CC091826B6E1090F399CF78A56A792000A5055E9
raterParticipantId -
createdAtMillis - 1661161660507
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 15614733625091440662E1A8CAD22E718690EFE2734CC091826B6E1090F399CF78A56A792000A5055E9