Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-07-10 19:18:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6B530DEEFAF1D1E788D8A3F0F053CD29C9C406C1CCFA71592DA9EFBAD1BF861
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not misleading. The tweet and headline both clearly state the law only bans recording police within 8 feet. The tweet also accurately reports that civil rights and media groups are nonetheless objecting. Whether individual birdwatchers agree with their concern is irrelevant. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/09/us/arizona-recording-police-8-feet.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1546193274825805825
participantId - C6B530DEEFAF1D1E788D8A3F0F053CD29C9C406C1CCFA71592DA9EFBAD1BF861
raterParticipantId -
createdAtMillis - 1657480685180
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1546193274825805825C6B530DEEFAF1D1E788D8A3F0F053CD29C9C406C1CCFA71592DA9EFBAD1BF861