Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-07-05 23:37:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 402B540523477342514CCBFB8666A02B089D96DD1F4F411E97879DB801B9D532
Participant Details

Original Note:

We do not know if Judge Clarence Thomas has ever identified as a woman. We do know that Ketanji Brown Jackson can not identify a woman since she's a judge and not a biologist. Therefore the Reuters article is incorrect. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-baffled-ketanji-brown-jackson-define-woman

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1542964360359817216
  • participantId - 402B540523477342514CCBFB8666A02B089D96DD1F4F411E97879DB801B9D532
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1657064268100
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1542964360359817216402B540523477342514CCBFB8666A02B089D96DD1F4F411E97879DB801B9D532