Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-26 01:32:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 862E84AD6C488AB3037EAC4682346692F09F61D556BF80E01E4F8B21C28D08CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet makes a sensational claim with no supporting information, checkable details, or follow-up. Although it begins '1)' in the style of a thread, there are no further tweets that would shed light on its startling claim. No mention of the story on the main @foxnews timeline.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1541609244834680832
  • participantId - 862E84AD6C488AB3037EAC4682346692F09F61D556BF80E01E4F8B21C28D08CA
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674696765983
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1541609244834680832862E84AD6C488AB3037EAC4682346692F09F61D556BF80E01E4F8B21C28D08CA