Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-28 00:02:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A30E23B01F927C4387616E33DE422C96B4F9A9B45B8ACA619267391F3D77B5A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court decision does not mean police are not required to inform someone of their rights before being interrogated. It only means they cannot be sued for failing to do so. Testimony given to police without being informed is presumably still not admissible in court. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-supreme-court-protects-police-miranda-lawsuits-2022-06-23/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1541465459987316737
participantId - A30E23B01F927C4387616E33DE422C96B4F9A9B45B8ACA619267391F3D77B5A8
raterParticipantId -
createdAtMillis - 1656374578702
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1541465459987316737A30E23B01F927C4387616E33DE422C96B4F9A9B45B8ACA619267391F3D77B5A8