Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-26 15:52:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55F81A07385269D44158BFF4C51EECD2D111F9128BD22AF52A82FBD92FEF9C47
Participant Details

Original Note:

I’m his June 25th tweet, Cornyn is referring to landmark Supreme Court decisions that did not follow stare decisis precedent to express his agreement with the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs. It is not apparent he is advocating for a return to segregation. https://twitter.com/JohnCornyn/status/1540763079520096256?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1540763079520096256%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fd-1288538970990851114.ampproject.net%2F2206101637000%2Fframe.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1541079096356179970
  • participantId - 55F81A07385269D44158BFF4C51EECD2D111F9128BD22AF52A82FBD92FEF9C47
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1656258750354
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 154107909635617997055F81A07385269D44158BFF4C51EECD2D111F9128BD22AF52A82FBD92FEF9C47