Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-26 15:54:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2754E43902F81C4806F6CADF1821C1140150605963B6061F2F6C4FC69B6B16C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

I’m his June 25th tweet, Cornyn is referring to landmark Supreme Court decisions that did not follow stare decisis precedent to express his agreement with the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs. It is not apparent he is advocating for a return to segregation. https://twitter.com/JohnCornyn/status/1540763079520096256?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1540763079520096256%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fd-1288538970990851114.ampproject.net%2F2206101637000%2Fframe.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1541079096356179970
  • participantId - 2754E43902F81C4806F6CADF1821C1140150605963B6061F2F6C4FC69B6B16C1
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1656258890601
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15410790963561799702754E43902F81C4806F6CADF1821C1140150605963B6061F2F6C4FC69B6B16C1