Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-10-03 16:37:54 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C577259366B49D2C4213F5935B3CCD8B444D7A18AA9D098CECC73436143CC310
Participant Details
Original Note:
Accepting a previous ruling as the current law of the land but eventually issuing a contradictory ruling to it is not perjurious by nature. The Supreme Court Justices in question merely demured to stare decisis. https://jonathanturley.org/2022/05/04/no-conservative-justices-did-not-commit-perjury-in-confirmation-on-reversing-roe/
All Note Details