Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-25 22:35:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E1F05690AAF83EA44AD4E5773A5E6256508C3FE93F2A359831142A5E7AF91EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's obvious that Cornyn is suggesting that past precedent (Plessy) CAN be overturned (Brown). People are misconstruing this intentionally as the opposite which is spreading misinformation. https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1540767433010683904

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1540796187376291842
  • participantId - 0E1F05690AAF83EA44AD4E5773A5E6256508C3FE93F2A359831142A5E7AF91EC
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1656196559880
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15407961873762918420E1F05690AAF83EA44AD4E5773A5E6256508C3FE93F2A359831142A5E7AF91EC