Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-24 18:44:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C653C8EFBCA30A6F685E40AB134A7E49AB8C2CABAFD1E22BBEE6E8CBA33CC4B8
Participant Details
Original Note:
The majority opinion & Thomas's concurring opinion state the decision does not cast doubt on the precedents set in the cases cited. The suggestion to reconsider past cases related to Roe is made only by Thomas. The minority opinion disagrees that past cases won't be affected https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf
All Note Details