Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-24 16:54:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: BA66430EC08B57CD5BDD4A269C9EB06CF8F8B4D0264EEFAB3F0313865B91C42D
Participant Details
Original Note:
The majority opinion & Thomas's concurring opinion state the decision does not cast doubt on the precedents set in the cases cited. The suggestion to reconsider past cases related to Roe is made only by Thomas. The minority opinion disagrees that past cases won't be affected https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf
All Note Details