Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-24 21:08:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 8EE34B83A8C2778B30A39DEB0A05B9B023F7D294203C78C386C3B66D11D39637
Participant Details
Original Note:
The majority opinion & Thomas's concurring opinion state the decision does not cast doubt on the precedents set in the cases cited. The suggestion to reconsider past cases related to Roe is made only by Thomas. The minority opinion disagrees that past cases won't be affected https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf
All Note Details