Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-24 17:14:38 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4D4924E31EBF6954985B090EDA446B461C82F9A9B23450ACD7122C2E984712FF
Participant Details
Original Note:
The majority opinion & Thomas's concurring opinion state the decision does not cast doubt on the precedents set in the cases cited. The suggestion to reconsider past cases related to Roe is made only by Thomas. The minority opinion disagrees that past cases won't be affected https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf
All Note Details