Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-24 18:18:54 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 33BCB21ECCE1646FED6C42579B16B9D12597D77C4A0769B186569D665E9EE7DE
Participant Details
Original Note:
The majority opinion & Thomas's concurring opinion state the decision does not cast doubt on the precedents set in the cases cited. The suggestion to reconsider past cases related to Roe is made only by Thomas. The minority opinion disagrees that past cases won't be affected https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf
All Note Details