Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-24 19:16:49 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0B683F53A71314B5B037053E967D8B7476EE62CEC7C245474E462A3294BE2995
Participant Details
Original Note:
The majority opinion & Thomas's concurring opinion state the decision does not cast doubt on the precedents set in the cases cited. The suggestion to reconsider past cases related to Roe is made only by Thomas. The minority opinion disagrees that past cases won't be affected https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf
All Note Details