Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-24 20:15:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FFBF758C21ED1630176A94C4BDA94ACB1D67A48D00B1B21424C7CF5BEE51F8B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

In the Bruen case, SCOTUS struck down a test as onerous, creating no new rights. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/new-york-state-rifle-pistol-association-inc-v-bruen/ In Dobbs, SCOTUS has limited itself to considering only the viability question as permissible. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051721zor_6537.pdf Neither case has as broad a scope as the poster suggests.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1540305182411603973
  • participantId - FFBF758C21ED1630176A94C4BDA94ACB1D67A48D00B1B21424C7CF5BEE51F8B1
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1656101722431
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1540305182411603973FFBF758C21ED1630176A94C4BDA94ACB1D67A48D00B1B21424C7CF5BEE51F8B1