Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-24 16:08:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C7955E17D19E0DC44A6E7B5D6486261B71376D90AA81A684ECB6BA97A8F39DD7
Participant Details
Original Note:
In the Bruen case, SCOTUS struck down a test as onerous, creating no new rights. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/new-york-state-rifle-pistol-association-inc-v-bruen/ In Dobbs, SCOTUS has limited itself to considering only the viability question as permissible. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051721zor_6537.pdf Neither case has as broad a scope as the poster suggests.
All Note Details