Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-24 23:22:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3B4A842A09CF54D087EF8F10F59E2F89A5036371639CD1D96BB0BDD8A61052C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

In the Bruen case, SCOTUS struck down a test as onerous, creating no new rights. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/new-york-state-rifle-pistol-association-inc-v-bruen/ In Dobbs, SCOTUS has limited itself to considering only the viability question as permissible. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051721zor_6537.pdf Neither case has as broad a scope as the poster suggests.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1540305182411603973
  • participantId - 3B4A842A09CF54D087EF8F10F59E2F89A5036371639CD1D96BB0BDD8A61052C1
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1656112936179
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15403051824116039733B4A842A09CF54D087EF8F10F59E2F89A5036371639CD1D96BB0BDD8A61052C1