Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-09 16:41:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A6F457F57D7D322AD906E4B7F202CB4C5C44FDF63F4047C1320CEFDB2EEB7E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court ruled that actual innocence is not a valid argument to a federal habeus corpus claim of ineffective counsel; “Federal courts … lack the competence and authority to relitigate a State’s criminal case,” wrote Associate Justice Clarence Thomas. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1009_19m2.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1532197213379739648
  • participantId - 0A6F457F57D7D322AD906E4B7F202CB4C5C44FDF63F4047C1320CEFDB2EEB7E3
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1654792889177
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15321972133797396480A6F457F57D7D322AD906E4B7F202CB4C5C44FDF63F4047C1320CEFDB2EEB7E3