Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-25 14:02:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9736DF42171A999208E640D9616E3AF1D2219C9694E38F806D374F891F58485E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The journalist is voicing a opinion, does not cite a pending case and provides no evidence in this or subsequent tweets. It is inflammatory in a stand-alone state. He is probably referencing https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/10/in-major-second-amendment-case-court-will-review-limits-on-carrying-a-concealed-gun-in-public/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1529330953012711424
  • participantId - 9736DF42171A999208E640D9616E3AF1D2219C9694E38F806D374F891F58485E
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1653487336580
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15293309530127114249736DF42171A999208E640D9616E3AF1D2219C9694E38F806D374F891F58485E