Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-20 04:17:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EEA39E8B4AB1BEFA47B775A2CE4DCDDD073841F27C81F5E281FC7C6F7F045296
Participant Details

Original Note:

Many of the sources linked by the Tweet author are unreliable, expressions of opinions, rather than facts. Others are very outdated, with little to no fact-based evidence or linked studies to back them up. The tweet itself is a seeming expression of pure misogyny.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1527364463988355090
  • participantId - EEA39E8B4AB1BEFA47B775A2CE4DCDDD073841F27C81F5E281FC7C6F7F045296
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1653020274351
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1527364463988355090EEA39E8B4AB1BEFA47B775A2CE4DCDDD073841F27C81F5E281FC7C6F7F045296