Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-19 23:06:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 63466EBA93B97F68E7D4A9DD631C108CD49F7DD17CC8D4350728635ECC9C546C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Many of the sources linked by the Tweet author are unreliable, expressions of opinions, rather than facts. Others are very outdated, with little to no fact-based evidence or linked studies to back them up. The tweet itself is a seeming expression of pure misogyny.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1527364463988355090
  • participantId - 63466EBA93B97F68E7D4A9DD631C108CD49F7DD17CC8D4350728635ECC9C546C
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1653001608288
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 152736446398835509063466EBA93B97F68E7D4A9DD631C108CD49F7DD17CC8D4350728635ECC9C546C