Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-17 01:09:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 87AF826878393F4476E10D5F702135FB42635ECEAEC83A85D901C0DA581014D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Details of Patel v Garland:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/596/20-979/#tab-opinion-4582590 Details of FEC vs Ted Cruz :here:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/596/21-12/#tab-opinion-4582592 The poster is writing with opinionated language, but the rulings she describes are rooted in court opinions/dissents.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1526315709214621696
  • participantId - 87AF826878393F4476E10D5F702135FB42635ECEAEC83A85D901C0DA581014D9
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1652749785225
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 152631570921462169687AF826878393F4476E10D5F702135FB42635ECEAEC83A85D901C0DA581014D9