Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-11 23:23:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2011B0400F26357897E9A8BE66063F04724939F2707248B3F7DCCF4B6340EEEF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The headline implies that favoring free speech while engaging in counter speech is somehow contradictory, further implying that counterspeech is tantamount to censorship when the speaker is of a certain identity. This is an invalid argument based on false premises. https://bit.ly/3MclMwn

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1524519500288249858
  • participantId - 2011B0400F26357897E9A8BE66063F04724939F2707248B3F7DCCF4B6340EEEF
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1652311420281
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15245195002882498582011B0400F26357897E9A8BE66063F04724939F2707248B3F7DCCF4B6340EEEF