Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-05 14:59:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A227869B752DF62F7538C29F2D2D225BAE499F3095FF33A985D81DD1C622A0E8
Participant Details

Original Note:

While Alito's argument explicitly states that the conclusion he comes to should not be read to have implications for other situations - such as same sex marriage - he also states that decisions based on a presumed right to privacy (including same sex marriage) are unfounded. https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/read-justice-alito-initial-abortion-opinion-overturn-roe-v-wade-pdf-00029504 https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/abortion-draft-raises-alarm-over-future-of-privacy-lgbt-rights

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1521953401457692673
  • participantId - A227869B752DF62F7538C29F2D2D225BAE499F3095FF33A985D81DD1C622A0E8
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1651762798066
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1521953401457692673A227869B752DF62F7538C29F2D2D225BAE499F3095FF33A985D81DD1C622A0E8